|
Post by Peter on Apr 7, 2019 12:54:50 GMT
Are you sure that you're deleting all of "anything" with "undefined"? I think you could have a "not anything" that behaves in the same way that "anything" does. Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 13:05:52 GMT
Are you sure that you're deleting all of "anything" with "undefined"? I think you could have a "not anything" that behaves in the same way that "anything" does. Correct me if I'm wrong. the code obviously proves anything "not anything" to be "undefined". Yes it carries with it anything but it's a skew on focus that defines it.
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 7, 2019 13:18:15 GMT
Are you sure that you're deleting all of "anything" with "undefined"? I think you could have a "not anything" that behaves in the same way that "anything" does. Correct me if I'm wrong. the code obviously proves anything "not anything" to be "undefined". Yes it carries with it anything but it's a skew on focus that defines it. So you're saying that the difference between anything and everything is "undefinable"? Same with the specification of anything. When you reach everything you include anything. Then you proceed to use the difference between anything and everything to make overtaking by deleting it. And that and everything you call God. After this you allow only God of God to make Divinity.
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 7, 2019 13:59:12 GMT
Anything = not nil Nothing = not Anything Everything = Anything and not Nothing Overtaking = Anything and not Anything God = Everything and Overtaking Divinity = God and not not God repeat repeat x = "" i = 0 i = i + 1 a = string.char(i) if Divinity then x = x .. a end until (i == 126) until (a == "") print (x)
|
|
|
Post by Darrick on Apr 7, 2019 14:55:40 GMT
Seen as you are using Boolean values with no input I don't think you'll get very far. All you're done no is going back and fourth between nil and true values there's no construct.
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 14:59:13 GMT
Seen as you are using Boolean values with no input I don't think you'll get very far. All you're done no is going back and fourth between nil and true values there's no construct. Every step the compiler takes has to go through the step before it to exist. Since a computer has no reference point in the beginning of a program I chose the differences amongst anything to compute them.
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 15:01:21 GMT
Anything = not nil Nothing = not Anything Everything = Anything and not Nothing Overtaking = Anything and not Anything God = Everything and Overtaking Divinity = God and not not God repeat i = 0 repeat x = "" i = i + 1 a = string.char(i) if Divinity then x = x .. a end until (i == 126) until (a == "") print (x)
|
|
|
Post by Darrick on Apr 7, 2019 15:46:06 GMT
Caught your little error there on the repeat loop. There's one man re that happens to be the value of baby x. Scoot that above the repeats you'll do better.
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 15:47:02 GMT
Anything = not nil Nothing = not Anything Everything = Anything and not Nothing Overtaking = Anything and not Anything God = Everything and Overtaking Divinity = God and not not God x = "" repeat i = 31 repeat i = i + 1 a = string.char(i) if Divinity then x = x .. a end until (i == 126) until (a == "") print (x)
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 7, 2019 15:57:38 GMT
The Boolean tree you've created seems right. I'm sorry I don't have any advice for depicting it to an if statement.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick on Apr 7, 2019 16:30:57 GMT
I'm a little confused on the last line there. wouldn't not not god be redundant?
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 16:33:18 GMT
I'm a little confused on the last line there. wouldn't not not god be redundant? It isn't redundant because it calls to a price of God that is and is not God and gets rid of the not part. Everything has a peice of the opposite in them at first. All I'm doing is calling them out to be computed.
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 7, 2019 17:59:04 GMT
See I thought if statements would work because the next bit of code would have to not be equal to not god but I guess it didn't work
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 7, 2019 18:03:01 GMT
See I thought if statements would work because the next bit of code would have to not be equal to not god but I guess it didn't work Hmm, how would that work?
|
|
|
Post by Derrick on Apr 7, 2019 18:23:00 GMT
See I thought if statements would work because the next bit of code would have to not be equal to not god but I guess it didn't work Hmm, how would that work? Well if "Divinity" where given a chance to change... Till then it's all ifs.
|
|