|
Post by Peter on Apr 8, 2019 13:17:16 GMT
What you need is your "and" statements to simultaneously be together and arguing. That way the computer is forced to make a decision respectively true or fals. This should follow the implications involving your code, as a they appear appea as decision making.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick on Apr 8, 2019 15:46:16 GMT
Now that's a way to screw your code up.
Don't do that
I have no further advice
|
|
Guy
New Member
Posts: 18
|
Post by Guy on Apr 8, 2019 19:17:04 GMT
😂 Still doing this?
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 8, 2019 20:36:56 GMT
Yesh. The program is pure evil. Think about it. Pure evil.
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 8, 2019 20:38:09 GMT
Anything = not nil Nothing = not Anything Everything = Anything and not Nothing Overtaking = Anything and Nothing God = Everything and Overtaking Divinity = God and not not God x = "" repeat i = 32 repeat i = i + 1 a = string.char(i) if Divinity then x = x .. a else x = x end until (i == 126) until (x == x .. "") print (x)
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 8, 2019 20:40:14 GMT
"Can't think of something"
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 8, 2019 22:07:13 GMT
--here's one that spits out every letter and I have no idea why someone please help
Anything = not nil Nothing = not Anything Everything = Anything and not Nothing Overtaking = Anything and Nothing God = Everything and Overtaking Purity = God and not not God Divinity = Purity and nil x = "" repeat i = 32 repeat i = i + 1 a = string.char(i) if Divinity == Purity then x = x .. a else x = x end until (i == 126) until (x == x .. "") print (x)
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 8, 2019 22:40:53 GMT
I thought no information would give a Not not God response if no information was truely that but I guess it just always does it
Like it would take over if it wasn't applicable
How to know something about nothing...
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 10, 2019 17:16:35 GMT
Your problem is that the false still equal what they equal, along side of the entire boolean tree being accounted for for the last boolean value.
|
|
|
Post by Derrick on Apr 10, 2019 18:51:37 GMT
That sounds about right
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 10, 2019 20:32:25 GMT
Yeah it's not separating Divinity and its contents so no Boolean value is assigned straight to divinity
|
|
|
Post by ollieha1 on Apr 10, 2019 21:02:18 GMT
I don't understand. If Divinity is the sum of its parts, then what is Divinity without its parts?
|
|
|
Post by Derrick on Apr 10, 2019 21:03:08 GMT
The Sum lol
|
|
|
Post by Ollie Ha on Apr 10, 2019 21:19:16 GMT
This is going nowhere
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Apr 10, 2019 21:37:11 GMT
The end is either all false or all true, regardless of what I s composed of. Hopefully the gives you some good leads.
|
|